Quality versus quantity
Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008By now everyone knows the second LA Times editor in as many years has quit over a disagreement in how to manage resources. Specifically, Editor Jim O’Shea refused to make more cuts to the Times newsroom.
In his farewell memo, Mr. O’Shea crystallizes the growing problem for newspapers today in terms of quality journalism and what our profession was originally constructed to achieve and can still achieve — given the appropriate resources.
I especially like these two grafs:
This company, indeed, this industry, must invest more in solid, relevant journalism. We must integrate the speed and agility of the Internet with the news judgment and editorial values of the newsroom, values that are more important than ever as the hunger for news continues to surge and gossip pollutes the information atmosphere. Even in hard times, wise investment — not retraction – is the long-term answer to the industry’s troubles. We must build on our core strength, which is good, accurate reporting, the backbone of solid journalism, the public service that helps people make the right decisions about their increasingly complex lives.
We must tell people what they want to know and – even more important — what they might not want to know, about war, politics, economics, schools, corruption and the thoughts and deeds of those who lead us. We need to tell readers more about Barack Obama and less about Britney Spears. We must give a voice to those who can’t afford a megaphone. And we must become more than a marketing slogan. I know I can rely on this newsroom to do this.
I don’t think it’s naive to follow a strategy that achieves both the solid journalism O’Shea refers to AND strengthens our online products and grows audience everywhere people want news and information.
But, if our product is nothing but smut, gossip and pandering to the lowest common denominator I’m afraid the audience growth will be minimal. I’m even more afraid of what would happen to our society if we continue down the slippery slope and do not invest in good news judgment and editorial values.